<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Startlogic email account</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.startlogicreview.org/startlogic-email-account/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.startlogicreview.org/startlogic-email-account</link>
	<description>Real Startlogic reviews and Startlogic user reviews that you must read before signup Startlogic.com hosting. Startlogic reviews from forums, blogs, and user submitted. Startlogic reviews of php hosting, windows hosting, vps hosting, and dedicated server. Startlogic multiple domain hosting from $3.95, regular price $5.95 and startlogic domain at wholesale price of $6.50 per year. This startlogic blog also about startlogic discount, startlogic rebate and startlogic promotion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:50:41 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garry</title>
		<link>http://www.startlogicreview.org/startlogic-email-account/comment-page-1#comment-16977</link>
		<dc:creator>Garry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startlogicreview.org/startlogic-email-account/#comment-16977</guid>
		<description>There is only one major problem that I have with Startlogic email. It is annoying enough that I am seriously considering moving my 20 someodd domains to another host.

Every 90 days I get notification on many of my email boxes that they will be disabled due to &quot;non-use&quot;. According to Startlogic, this is to prevent spam, which is total bullcrap. If my email was being used for spam, you wouldn&#039;t be sending me a notice disabling it for non-use...BECAUSE IT WOULD BE USED FOR SENDING SPAM!!!. Instead of running a program that monitors for spam against the emails, they have decided it is better to monitor for non-use and just threaten their customers who pay for a mail box. Because I don&#039;t use it has nothing to do with spam and I find it rather offensive that every 90 days they threaten to close all my email accounts because they are not used. 

I have tried talking to Startlogic about this but I get the same stonewalling at the intermediary level that you would expect when a company gets to a certain size (i.e. it is our policy). They did suggest that I forward the emails to a primary, but that doesn&#039;t work when I am hosting other&#039;s websites, but they don&#039;t really care about that. It really doesn&#039;t matter why I&#039;m not getting email to these accounts, I paid for them.

Anyway, if you have sites and you are just leaving them alone, I would recommend someone else. If you know for sure you will check your email within 90 days, go for it. They are fine otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is only one major problem that I have with Startlogic email. It is annoying enough that I am seriously considering moving my 20 someodd domains to another host.</p>
<p>Every 90 days I get notification on many of my email boxes that they will be disabled due to &#8220;non-use&#8221;. According to Startlogic, this is to prevent spam, which is total bullcrap. If my email was being used for spam, you wouldn&#8217;t be sending me a notice disabling it for non-use&#8230;BECAUSE IT WOULD BE USED FOR SENDING SPAM!!!. Instead of running a program that monitors for spam against the emails, they have decided it is better to monitor for non-use and just threaten their customers who pay for a mail box. Because I don&#8217;t use it has nothing to do with spam and I find it rather offensive that every 90 days they threaten to close all my email accounts because they are not used. </p>
<p>I have tried talking to Startlogic about this but I get the same stonewalling at the intermediary level that you would expect when a company gets to a certain size (i.e. it is our policy). They did suggest that I forward the emails to a primary, but that doesn&#8217;t work when I am hosting other&#8217;s websites, but they don&#8217;t really care about that. It really doesn&#8217;t matter why I&#8217;m not getting email to these accounts, I paid for them.</p>
<p>Anyway, if you have sites and you are just leaving them alone, I would recommend someone else. If you know for sure you will check your email within 90 days, go for it. They are fine otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
