<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Startlogic email account and email features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.startlogicreview.org/startlogic-email-account/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.startlogicreview.org/startlogic-email-account</link>
	<description>Real Startlogic Review &#38; Experience! Startlogic coupon code 50% off and $3.95/mo special discount. Startlogic reviews and Startlogic user reviews that you must read. This startlogic blog is about startlogic review, coupon, discount, rebate and promotion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 04:57:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garry</title>
		<link>http://www.startlogicreview.org/startlogic-email-account/comment-page-1#comment-16977</link>
		<dc:creator>Garry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.startlogicreview.org/startlogic-email-account/#comment-16977</guid>
		<description>There is only one major problem that I have with Startlogic email. It is annoying enough that I am seriously considering moving my 20 someodd domains to another host.

Every 90 days I get notification on many of my email boxes that they will be disabled due to &quot;non-use&quot;. According to Startlogic, this is to prevent spam, which is total bullcrap. If my email was being used for spam, you wouldn&#039;t be sending me a notice disabling it for non-use...BECAUSE IT WOULD BE USED FOR SENDING SPAM!!!. Instead of running a program that monitors for spam against the emails, they have decided it is better to monitor for non-use and just threaten their customers who pay for a mail box. Because I don&#039;t use it has nothing to do with spam and I find it rather offensive that every 90 days they threaten to close all my email accounts because they are not used. 

I have tried talking to Startlogic about this but I get the same stonewalling at the intermediary level that you would expect when a company gets to a certain size (i.e. it is our policy). They did suggest that I forward the emails to a primary, but that doesn&#039;t work when I am hosting other&#039;s websites, but they don&#039;t really care about that. It really doesn&#039;t matter why I&#039;m not getting email to these accounts, I paid for them.

Anyway, if you have sites and you are just leaving them alone, I would recommend someone else. If you know for sure you will check your email within 90 days, go for it. They are fine otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is only one major problem that I have with Startlogic email. It is annoying enough that I am seriously considering moving my 20 someodd domains to another host.</p>
<p>Every 90 days I get notification on many of my email boxes that they will be disabled due to &#8220;non-use&#8221;. According to Startlogic, this is to prevent spam, which is total bullcrap. If my email was being used for spam, you wouldn&#8217;t be sending me a notice disabling it for non-use&#8230;BECAUSE IT WOULD BE USED FOR SENDING SPAM!!!. Instead of running a program that monitors for spam against the emails, they have decided it is better to monitor for non-use and just threaten their customers who pay for a mail box. Because I don&#8217;t use it has nothing to do with spam and I find it rather offensive that every 90 days they threaten to close all my email accounts because they are not used. </p>
<p>I have tried talking to Startlogic about this but I get the same stonewalling at the intermediary level that you would expect when a company gets to a certain size (i.e. it is our policy). They did suggest that I forward the emails to a primary, but that doesn&#8217;t work when I am hosting other&#8217;s websites, but they don&#8217;t really care about that. It really doesn&#8217;t matter why I&#8217;m not getting email to these accounts, I paid for them.</p>
<p>Anyway, if you have sites and you are just leaving them alone, I would recommend someone else. If you know for sure you will check your email within 90 days, go for it. They are fine otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

